The Bush Doctrine/response to an asymmetrical threat

Stryker001

Banned Member
The unspoken objective was to kill as many women, children as possible and terrorise the Gaza Strip. Specifically, seeking out UN targets inside Gaza Strip. Regardless if the WHAM aspect of the planning was adopted or not, the civilian casualty rate would have been high, with at least 700,000 people still inside Gaza Strip. The WHAM aspect was created solely to allow more time for the operation to continue by placating the international community/UN with the WHAM policy.

Hamas was warned that if Gilad Shilat was not returned, (Israel did offer a similar arrangement to the return of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev) that the response would be harsh, once you rebuild the destroyed infrastructure and the destroyed lives, the IDF will return and destroy your hopes. :israel

You should not have organised the shoe thrower Muntadhar al-Zaidi, (it always helps to know when and where your going to be doesn’t it Sir), the US greenlight for the operation in it current form would never have been given.

Hamas and the Resistance were never in control of the situation.


Goodbye and God Bless Mr President.:usa
 
Last edited:

AegisFC

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Do you have any real proof for your claims? You have already been banned a couple times for making racist and incoherent posts, so you are required to provide proof or adequately explain yourself to the mod team or you'll have a permanent ban. You have 24 hours.
 

AegisFC

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I posted an ultimatum for Stryker to provide proof or be banned permanently, he has 24 hours.
 
Top