Su-47 (S-37) Berkut Experimental Fighter Aircraft, Russia

fantasma

New Member
The Sukhoi Design Bureau of Moscow, Russia has developed the Su-47 (previously called the S-37 Berkut or Golden Eagle) fighter aircraft, which first flew in September 1997. Su-47 is in a forward swept wing configuration and uses a highly unstable triplane (with three main lifting surfaces) aerodynamic configuration. The Su-47 completed the first stage of flight trials in December 2001. In May 2002, Sukhoi was selected as prime contractor for the next-generation Russian PAK FA fighter programme. The PAK FA will be a development of the Su-47 but without the forward swept wings.

The design of the very high manoeuvrability prototype is based on the avionics and aerodynamics technologies developed for the Su-27 upgrade programme. Some of the systems and component designs from the Su-27, (the all weather supersonic fighter aircraft with NATO reporting name Flanker), have been used in the Su-47, for example the design of the canopy, landing gear, some of the avionics and the near-vertical tails.

MANOEUVRABILITY

The Su-47 has extremely high agility at subsonic speeds enabling the aircraft to alter its angle of attack and its flight path very quickly, and it also retains manoeuvrability in supersonic flight.

Maximum turn rates and the upper and lower limits on air speed for weapon launch are important criteria in terms of combat superiority. The Su-47 aircraft has very high levels of manoeuvrability with maintained stability and controllability at all angles of attack.

Maximum turn rates are important in close combat and also at medium and long range, when the mission may involve engaging consecutive targets in different sectors of the airspace. A high turn rate of the Su-47 allows the pilot to turn the fighter aircraft quickly towards the next target to initiate the weapon launch.

The swept-forward wing, compared to a swept-back wing of the same area, provides a number of advantages: higher lift to drag ratio; higher capacity in dogfight manoeuvres; higher range at subsonic speed; improved stall resistance and anti-spin characteristics; improved stability at high angles of attack; a lower minimum flight speed; and a shorter take-off and landing distance.

FUSELAGE

The Su-47 fuselage is oval in cross section and the airframe is constructed mainly of aluminium and titanium alloys and 13 per cent by weight of composite materials.

The nose radome is slightly flattened at the fore section and has a horizontal edge to optimise the aircraft's anti-spin characteristics.

WINGS

The forward swept midwing gives the unusual and characteristic appearance of the Su-47. A substantial part of the lift generated by the forward-swept wing occurs at the inner portion of the wingspan. The lift is not restricted by wingtip stall. The ailerons - the wing's control surfaces - remain effective at the highest angles of attack, and controllability of the aircraft is retained even in the event of airflow separating from the remainder of the wings' surface.

The wing panels of the Su-47 are constructed of nearly 90% composites. The forward-swept midwing has a high aspect ratio, which contributes to long-range performance. The leading-edge root extensions blend smoothly to the wing panels, which are fitted with deflectable slats on the leading edge; flaps and ailerons on the trailing edge.

The all-moving and small-area trapezoidal canards are connected to the leading-edge root extensions.

COCKPIT

The cockpit's design has focused on maintaining a high degree of comfort for the pilot and also on the pilot being able to control the aircraft in extremely high G-load manoeuvres. The aircraft is equipped with a new ejection seat and life support system. The variable geometry adaptive ejection seat is inclined at an angle of 60°, which reduces the impact of high G forces on the pilot. The seat allows dogfight manoeuvres with significantly higher G loadings than can normally be tolerated by the pilot.

The pilot uses a side-mounted, low-travel control stick and a tensometric throttle control.

LANDING GEAR

The aircraft uses a retractable tricycle-type landing gear with a single wheel at each unit. The smaller nose wheel retracts towards the rear and the two mainwheels retract forward into the wing roots.

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/s37/

it follows a video with this superb aircraft..absolutely magnificent
http://www.videos-aero.com/SU-47-berkut.html
 

alexsa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Looks increadibly agile but would appear to have a large RCS.
 

Big-E

Banned Member
Big-E I doubt the F-35 would be as aigle as Su-47 that was shown on the video.
As aerodynamically unstable as this configuration is it is no wonder they didn't push maneuvers... it most likely would fly apart. This isn't the small nimble X-29.. this is a cumbersome aircraft.
 

y_raj

New Member
the speed is also not very high, and is not very agile then what will it do without stealth?
it will fall of simply from the skies.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
the speed is also not very high, and is not very agile then what will it do without stealth?
it will fall of simply from the skies.
Are you referring to the F-35 or the SU-47, the topic of this thread?

IN relation to the F-35 you can believe what you like, but it's physical performance and agility is designed to be equal or greater than that of the F-18/F-16 series of fighters, with a much greater internal fuel load for significantly greater range AND it's stealthy AND the networking capability of the aircraft is so far beyond any other aircraft it's in a class of it's own.

The F-35 is a Mach 2 class capable aircraft and there are some indications it may have a supercruise capability, not equal to that of the F-222, but a capability nonetheless.

The F-35 WILL be a great combat aircraft.

Anyway, let's get back to the topic of discussing the SU-47 eh?
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
This thread is rapidly deteriorating.

It either starts to lift in quality really soon or it will run the risk of early closure.

In addition, if people are going to make comments about capability and aerodynamics then support the argument. Some of the stuff said to date has bordered on nonsensical.

There has been a stellar lack of quality as far as comments based in fact.
 

Big-E

Banned Member
In addition, if people are going to make comments about capability and aerodynamics then support the argument. Some of the stuff said to date has bordered on nonsensical.

There has been a stellar lack of quality as far as comments based in fact.
I base my assumptions on the results of the X-29 as we have no facts on the Berkut except what we see. The X-29 had little maneuverability without the use of (VFC) Vortex Flow Control at high alpha and I don't see the nozzles incorporated on the Berkut. Without VFC the Berkut's rudders lose effectiveness and has a hard time generating yaw. The forward swept wing makes any aircraft unstable as it increases side slip and causes rocking osciltation on the aircraft. VFC doesn't even help this as the X-29 team found out. It's no secret this design does provide a good high alpha but it can't maneuver unless it's below 21 degrees... which is not a high AoA. The Berkut is TWICE the size of the X-29... do you really think it will be more maneuverable? The Berkut can manuever at slow speeds better than most as the forward swept wing provides but as speed increases so does the instability of design. If she tries to accelerate past Mach 1.6 she will rock herself appart. She is good for subsonic work but without stealth she's just another target. I hope they use Berkut as a tech demonstrator and not base PAKFA on it.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Point to Note:

My previous comment was directed at all - and not at individuals.

We don't want to see threads deteriorate to "mine is better than yours" - which is the area it was skating dangerously close to.
 

Scorpion82

New Member
The Su-47 Berkut was intended as a 5th generation fighter to encounter the US ATF in the 1980's. The single prototype being built was first flown on 25 september 1997 and made more then 100 flights. The MiG OKB developed the MiG MFI concurrently and during the 80's it was planned to introduce both types. The end of cold war however led to the decision to procure only one type due to the lack of money. The RuAF eventually decided to order the developement of a new 5th gen fighter, now know as the T-50 (Sukhoi internal designation). The contract was awarded in 2002 to Sukhoi. The current T-50 has nothing to do with the Su-47 or MiG MFI, its entirly new. The Su-47 and MiG MFI were eventually approved as technology demonstrators, not more not less.

In contrast to the X-29, the Su-47 features tailerons and LERX. It is said the aircraft reaches top speeds about 2200 km/h and is able to supercruise, though I doubt it both has been demonstrated. For the proposed production version AL-41F turbofans with TVC were planned, but as the Su-47 project is dead now there will be no further work done. The Su-47 demonstrator was powered by two D-30 engines from the MiG-31.
The shown performance in the video is not very representive of what the aircraft really can do. Performances were limited for safety reasons by the FCS as it is the case with many modern fighters using FBW controls.
 

y_raj

New Member
Are you referring to the F-35 or the SU-47, the topic of this thread?

IN relation to the F-35 you can believe what you like, but it's physical performance and agility is designed to be equal or greater than that of the F-18/F-16 series of fighters, with a much greater internal fuel load for significantly greater range AND it's stealthy AND the networking capability of the aircraft is so far beyond any other aircraft it's in a class of it's own.

The F-35 is a Mach 2 class capable aircraft and there are some indications it may have a supercruise capability, not equal to that of the F-222, but a capability nonetheless.

The F-35 WILL be a great combat aircraft.

Anyway, let's get back to the topic of discussing the SU-47 eh?
I was reffering to su-47 if it has the sme capabilities as it is being said in the thread. becoz i have heard being more agile with a small cross section .
 
Top