In the last three years or so, there have been rumours on the Internet that China has developed the 360km-ranged MLR, saying the rocket adopts terminal radar image guidance system. The news was spread further to the international journals via Hong Kong's media, which named it "WS-2".
Kanwa interviewed the WS series MLR designer on this report. The source made it definitely clear that this so-called 360km-ranged terminal radar image guided MLR did not exist, and that there was even no such develop plan. "The basic design concept of MLR is that it can achieve the effect of massive destruction; as for precision strikes, that is the task of "campaign tactical ballistic missiles". How can a rocket fitted with terminal radar image guidance system still be called a "rocket"?
Why then was there the rumour that "China had developed 360km-ranged MLR"? The self-named "designer" of this MLR claimed on the Chinese Internet that he "designed" this MLR mainly because he hated Taiwan's independence.<For more details, see Kanwa issue 530>
chinese webhttp://www.kanwa.com/free/2004/05/c0513.htm
WS-1B MLR
Kanwa interviewed the WS series MLR designer on this report. The source made it definitely clear that this so-called 360km-ranged terminal radar image guided MLR did not exist, and that there was even no such develop plan. "The basic design concept of MLR is that it can achieve the effect of massive destruction; as for precision strikes, that is the task of "campaign tactical ballistic missiles". How can a rocket fitted with terminal radar image guidance system still be called a "rocket"?
Why then was there the rumour that "China had developed 360km-ranged MLR"? The self-named "designer" of this MLR claimed on the Chinese Internet that he "designed" this MLR mainly because he hated Taiwan's independence.<For more details, see Kanwa issue 530>
chinese webhttp://www.kanwa.com/free/2004/05/c0513.htm
WS-1B MLR