Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread

Ananda

The Bunker Group
Agree on that, if ROK want to pursue their own SSN through domestic effort, Japan certaintly can also done by domestic effort. Both have better Shipyards then AUKUS and mature reactor tech.
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Just a matter of time and SKorea will also. After that, WMD may be next for both countries albeit a tougher goal for Japan
Japan is very close to nuclear capability. Absurdly so.. They still have 50 t of plutonim. They already make solid fuel rocket ICBMs..
I'd put money on the Japanese getting a boat in the water way before AUKUS. They're better off alone IMO
Japan would want to do it to show technical capability. They don't want to be reliant on anyone. I imagine every time they build a new sub generation, they draft up what a nuclear SSN would look like, cost it through, identify duel use techs, etc. They would be benchmarking them as much as they can and the best way to do that is to basically do design work.

Both have significant nuclear and submarine experience. They could certainly do it. But the SSN may look different, I wouldn't be surprised if they favour low speed performance, completely silent reactors, etc. I don't think they want an AUKUS or French style sub anyway. They don't have to travel far to find targets.
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Satellite launchers - but they could be used as a base for ICBMs.
Yes, very convenient Sat launchers. Very dual use though. They would still need re-entry vechicles etc, but the basic tech hardware is very accessible to them. They aren't miles off, everyone knows it. NK annoying JP with nuclear weapons is stupid because it will just justify JP to get them, China knows this.

I've been thinking about this ship a lot.

I wonder if it will debuted with a production version of the 40mm rail gun Japan test fired and showed mock ups instead of 30mm millennium gun type mounts shown in models.

The rear superstructure is completely separate, cooling, power etc would be ideally placed for these two guns. This would then allow the second ship to be built with perhaps the main gun replaced with a rail gun. These ships don't really need a 127mm gun. The whole ship is built around huge power and cooling capabilities, these guns would be excellent test beds for the rest of the fleet, what future designs would need, the power and cooling is already there which is the really tricky part.

This ship could launch sat/BM interceptors from its main gun, and the side mounts could be very effective cruise/drone guns. And there is two of them.. And the ship has RIM (could be laser in future) and plenty of VLS for ESSM etc, and likely escorted where ever it goes. Even if these are just experimental fitouts and they go conventional eventually.
 

SolarisKenzo

Well-Known Member
To have some commercial rockets and plutonium doesnt mean you are close to have a nuclear weapon.
Also, let's be honest, nuclear devices today are not exactly star trek science.
More or less every advanced country has the resources to design one (being it nuclear or thermonuclear or whatever).

France has around half of the world plutonium reprocessing capacity, but what does it mean?
Japan has plutonium because it reprocesses NPPs uranium oxide into mixed-oxide fuel.

The political will is the real problem. Almost everyone, with political will, can have nuclear weapons.
North Korea managed to do it, not exactly the most advanced nation on the planet.


All these discussions about "Japan is very close to" or "Country X has a stockpile of plutonium" or "they have commercial rocket tech" are quite pointless.
Very interesting discussions for defense nerds, but pretty much pointless.
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
"they have commercial rocket tech"
Its not just commercial rocket tech. Its very specifically a solid rocket, with the dimensions of a US ICBM (its first stage). Its a 75t solid rocket.
France is a nuclear weapon state.

Japan has 44t of plutonium. The most of any non nuclear weapon state. As much as all non nuclear states globally combined. So its not it also has it. It has lots of it.

But this is a navy thread. Japan is looking at SSNs.. They have the nuclear technology to go that alone.

I am pretty sure they are going to mount rail guns on the side, those are ready to go, and the second ship will likely be built with its main gun also a rail gun. This will be refitted onto the first ship.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
China and India already have nuclear submarines, Brazil will get one soon, and South-Korea recently started the Chang Bogo N Project. So there is actually no reason for Japan to not start an SSN program.
 
Top