J-10 or no J-10

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4


No there is a huge difference. Its not LCA
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
armage said:
Could be the Lavi or somebody just used photoshop and did a little magice on it.... :D:


There is a difference.
 

adsH

New Member
its the same dam picture just made it look abit different thats the reason why they added the blurriness on top

the missile loads are exactly the same can't be. this is again one of those Chinese PS job.
 

adsH

New Member
i can see the distortions those marks are observable if you overlap the pics they are exactly the same. Just some really Poor PS job thats the reason i never trust Chinese websites.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
Whats the point of creating such confussion.

They also created confusion with J-XX. Two different websites gave two different artistic impressions. In the end both websites took it off.
DT is one of the few right now that has the pics, both impressions.
 

mysterious

New Member
Thats good cuz here at DT we stand for authenticity and credibility in reporting defense and defense-equipment related information. We should keep those two impressions and this fake pic of J-10 to let the readers beware of such tricks. The web community would be glad I tell you. :smokingc:
 

highsea

New Member
Ultrafang, you leave us with the impression you didn't even read the thread. Everyone here is quite aware that the pic is a photoshopped Typhoon, and we all know what the J-10 looks like, thank you.
 

ultrafang

New Member
highsea said:
Ultrafang, you leave us with the impression you didn't even read the thread. Everyone here is quite aware that the pic is a photoshopped Typhoon, and we all know what the J-10 looks like, thank you.
I read it, and it looks like they are thinking it's a eurofighter-2000. Unless they are been sarcastic, but how am i supose to know they are been sarcastic.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
ultrafang said:
I read it, and it looks like they are thinking it's a eurofighter-2000. Unless they are been sarcastic, but how am i supose to know they are been sarcastic.
:cop

In future can you please take time to read all the responses properly before commenting. The immediate clue for you should have been when someone posted an image of a typhoon and the photshopped aircraft. They even went into detail talking about the overlay fit. It was self evident.

A number of posters had pointed out why it was a Typhoon - none of them were sarcastic, and as indicated, one actually went to the trouble of providing the original source that was PS'd.
 
Top