Iran displays ballistic missiles

P.A.F

New Member
http://www.dawn.com/2004/09/22/top14.htm

TEHRAN, Sept 21: Iran showed off its range of ballistic missiles at an annual military parade on Tuesday, with the rockets draped in banners vowing to "crush America" and "wipe Israel off the map".

A banner stating "Israel must be wiped off the map" was draped on the side of a Shahab-2 missile, while a banner saying "We will crush America under our feet" was on the side of a trailer carrying the latest Shahab-3 missile.

The parade marks the beginning of "Sacred Defence Week", an event commemorating Iraq's 1980 attack on Iran and the outset of the bloody eight-year war. "The Shahab-3 missiles, with different ranges, enables us to destroy the most distant targets," said an official commentary accompanying the parade, which was carried live on state television.

"These missiles enable us to destroy the enemy with missile strikes," the commentary said, without giving any specific details on the range of the missiles. The Shahab-3 is Iran's most advanced missile and is capable of hitting arch-enemy Israel. -AFP
 

srirangan

Banned Member
> A banner stating "Israel must be wiped off the map" was draped on the
> side of a Shahab-2 missile, while a banner saying "We will crush America
> under our feet" was on the side of a trailer carrying the latest Shahab-3
> missile.

Pathetic. A rich an ancient civilization like the Persians; and now it seems they only exist to bleed Israel and the US. Iran is a prime candidate for regime change, I am sure the people of Iran are totally reasonable people unlike their hate filled rulers.
 

mysterious

New Member
How would you know? Have you ever read even a single history book on Iran and the Shah and what all the Iranians have been made to go through?
 

srirangan

Banned Member
Iranian history doesn't start with the Shah. Ever heard of Darius? The Assariyan Empire? The Persians were one of the most successful civilizations in the ancient times, and this extremist Islamic govt. is doing them no good.

Instead of carving their own future, Iran has ended up becoming a pawn for the Arab's against the Jews.
 

yasin_khan

New Member
Iranian history doesn't start with the Shah. Ever heard of Darius? The Assariyan Empire? The Persians were one of the most successful civilizations in the ancient times, and this extremist Islamic govt. is doing them no good.
Sri u r right.If they want to destroy USA and Israel then do it why they r so proud of making that missile.And supose they attack Israel with any nuclear missile then what will happen when Isaelis and Allied nations give them response.
 

mysterious

New Member
Oh please people! Iranian missiles are in a way more of a defensive thing than an aggressive one. They just parade them off and on so that anyone thinking of an invasion or pre-emptive strike would think twice (atleast for the sake of Israel). Iranians won't actually initiate a war/aggression with Israel but they want to make sure that they have a bloody response waiting for whoever tries to attack them! You gotta read between the lines my friend! :smokingc:
 

P.A.F

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
http://www.dawn.com/2004/09/26/top16.htm

Iran hands over strategic missiles to armed forces

TEHRAN, Sept 25: Iran said on Saturday it has successfully test-fired a strategic missile and delivered it to its armed forces, state-run radio reported.

"This strategic missile was successfully test-fired during (the recent) military exercises by the Revolutionary Guards and delivered to the armed forces," Defence Minister Ali Shamkhani was quoted by the radio as saying.

The announcement came days after Israel said it was buying from the United States about 5,000 smart bombs, including 500 one-ton bunker-busters that can destroy 6-foot-thick concrete walls.

The missile, unnamed for security reasons, was successfully tested last week, Shamkhani was quoted as saying by state television.

It was unclear if the weapon in question was the Shahab-3 medium-range missile, acquired by the Revolutionary Guards in July last year, of which an improved version was successfully tested in August.

The Shahab-3 is based on a North Korean design and is thought to be capable of carrying a one-ton warhead at least 1,300 kilometres, well within range of Israel.

Steady progress made by Iran's ballistic missile programme is a source of concern to many countries, adding to worries about the country's nuclear programme, which Tehran insists is peaceful.

DEADLINE: The UN nuclear watchdog passed a resolution on Saturday setting a Nov 25 deadline for Iran to clear up suspicions over its nuclear activities or risk having the issue referred to the Security Council for possible sanctions.

The International Atomic Energy Agency resolution also demanded that Iran halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, a part of the nuclear fuel cycle that can be used for both energy and weapons purposes.

Iran has repeatedly insisted that its nuclear programme is intended for domestic energy needs.

Iran says the Shahab-3 is simply a deterrent, while Israel charges that the Islamic state could have a nuclear warhead by 2007, leading to speculation that Israel may launch a preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.

In 1981, Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear reactor before the reactor could begin operating and the smart bombs are believed to be capable of destroying Iranian nuclear facilities.

The elite Revolutionary Guards staged military manoeuvres earlier this month near the border with Iraq, with top military officials saying the exercise was designed to reinforce Iran's resolve to defend itself against "big powers."

During the manoeuvres, state-run radio described the missile as a "long-range missile" that would be test-fired. Later, there was no official confirmation of the test.

In New York, French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said on Friday that Iran's nuclear programme could be referred to the UN Security Council if the world is not reassured about its nuclear ambitions.

"We are waiting clearly from Iran gestures and decisions that will reassure us," Barnier said in a lunch with French media on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

"Since there is a trust problem, dates have been set," he said, referring to a Nov 25 deadline for Iran to clear up suspicions over its activities or risk having the issue referred to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions- something the United States has sought.

"It will be a moment of truth," Barnier said, referring to the deadline. "I do not know for certain, but I have the feeling that the gravity of this moment has been well understood (by Tehran)."

"If I am proven wrong, or if we do not obtain these gestures, we will see through what conditions to pass to next step, which is the Security Council," Barnier said. "But we are not there yet."

The IAEA resolution also demands that Iran halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, a part of the nuclear fuel cycle that can be used for both energy and weapons purposes.

Tehran has repeatedly insisted that its nuclear programme is intended for domestic energy needs.

Iran insisted on Friday it would do everything possible to reassure a jittery world about its nuclear programme.

"While we insist on our right to technology for peaceful purposes, we have and will leave no stone unturned in order to provide assurances of our peaceful intentions," Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi said at the United Nations.-AP/AFP
 

P.A.F

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
http://www.dawn.com/2004/09/27/top12.htm

Bush says Iran will not get nukes

CRAWFORD, Sept 26: US President George W. Bush says "all options are on the table" for making sure Iran dismantles its nuclear programme, and that Washington will never let Tehran acquire atomic weapons.

"My hope is that we can solve this diplomatically," Bush said in a three-part interview with Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor" programme, excerpts of which were made public on Sunday.

"Let me try to solve it diplomatically first," said Mr Bush. "All options are on the table, of course, in any situation. But diplomacy is the first option." The Bush administration has charged that Iran does not need a civilian nuclear programme for energy and that Tehran is actually seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.

Asked whether the United States would let Iran develop that capability, Mr Bush replied: "No, we've made it clear, our position is that they won't have a nuclear weapon."

"We are working our hearts out so that they don't develop a nuclear weapon, and the best way to do so is to continue to keep international pressure on them," the president said.

IRAN'S STAND: Iran called on Sunday for a negotiated settlement to its stand off with the UN atomic energy watchdog but showed no inclination to abide by a resolution calling for an immediate halt to its sensitive nuclear activities.

"No negotiations with the Americans are on the agenda, but we call on the Europeans to discuss with us," foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told reporters. -AFP
 

VICTORA1

New Member
Guys,
Iran is talking too much. Just asking for the bull. I believe that a little discretion goes along ways. There is no use in getting into a pissing contest with anyone. You want to do something, then go ahead and do it first and then wait for the consequences. Iran is waiting for the consequences first and then maybe later on they will do or they would want to do something that they wanted to do earlier for what they thought there would be a retaliation which had already taken place before they did something that they wanted to do later.
:? :help :idea2
 
Top