French Snubbed By Saudis

pshamim

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
After loosing Morocco, French have now lost Saudi Arabia as one of the major customers. Does not look very good for French Arms Industry.


France Looses Out as Saudis sign $2.2 Billion deal for Russian Helos
PARIS --- In an abrupt policy shift, Saudi Arabia has signed an agreement to buy over 150 Russian-made Mi-35 Hind and Mi-17 Hip helicopters worth over $2.2 billion, ending French hopes of sealing a long-delayed sale of 148 helicopters and raising doubts about future French arms sales to the Saudi kingdom.

Sources say the Memorandum of Understanding with Russia was signed in Ryad in mid-September by members of the private cabinet of Saudi King Abdallah bin Abd al-Aziz Al Saud, and follows extended visits to Russia by Saudi military delegations in February and March 2007 to appraise the capabilities of Russian helicopters and other weapons.

The sources also said that Saudi Arabia appears to have decided to buy T-90 main battle tanks and medium-range air-defense systems from Russia, replacing previous plans to buy French-made Leclerc tanks and Aster 30 SAMP/T air-defense systems. No agreement has yet been signed for these systems, however,

Eurocopter confirmed that Saudi Arabia has opted for Russian helicopters, but said the company’s future prospects in the country remained unclear. Nexter, manufacturer of the Leclerc tank, and missile maker MBDA had no comment on the status of their dealings with Saudi Arabia.

While conceding that the Saudis had signed an agreement to buy Russian utility helicopters, a senior French official told defense-aerospace.com that the Mi-17 and Mi-35 met only part of the Saudi requirement. Noting that the two Saudi customers – the Armed Forces and the National Guard - would not necessarily buy the same equipment, he said that France was still in the running to sell several other helicopter types. These include naval, Combat Search And Rescue and training helicopters, he implied, for which Russian helicopters are unsuited.

Saudi Arabia’s decision to retain Russia as a major arms supplier is the result of two recent policy decisions made by King Abdallah bin Abd al-Aziz Al Saud. One was Abdallah’s decision to take direct control of major arms purchases, which were previously largely the domain of the defense and aviation ministry headed by Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz, the Saudi Crown Prince and deputy prime minister who is also Abdallah’s half-brother. Sultan is said to be out of favor.

Abdallah also is loosening arms ties with France because of its insistence on large, multiple-system packages, and its stubborn arm-twisting to include weapons that the Saudis do not want, like the Rafale combat aircraft, in these packages.

While the Saudis were willing as late as the fall of 2006 to sign two or three medium-sized helicopters deals, covering 42 Fennec light helicopters, 20 Cougar Combat Search and Rescue helicopters and 10 NFH-90 naval helicopters, sources say they indefinitely postponed these plans after French officials continued to insist that the package also include Rafales, several FREMM frigates and Gowind corvettes, and Leclerc tanks.

“The idea of selling comprehensive packages was pushed by the Elysée [the French President’s office-Ed.] as a final coup for [former President Jacques] Chirac,” one industry official told defense-aerospace.com. “Now, Chirac’s gone, we’ve signed nothing, and we’re shut out of the Saudi market for the foreseeable future. A real success for France,” the official said.

France has now conceded it will not sell Rafale to Saudi Arabia. “We haven’t discussed Rafale in Saudi Arabia. It’s not a current issue,” French Defense Minister Hervé Morin said Oct. 28 in Jeddah, after talks with Saudi leaders.

[France is hoping that Libya, which has contracted to upgrade its obsolete Dassault Mirage F-1 fighters, may also agree to buy the Rafale, and an agreement could be announced during Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s forthcoming visit to Paris, possibly in December.]

The Saudis are also said to be unhappy with what they perceive as French snubs. These include the French government’s failure to appoint an official of sufficiently high rank to head Sofresa, the arms export agency especially set up to handle contracts with Saudi Arabia. France’s use of local marketing networks that include individuals that are “persona non grata” at King Abdallah’s court is seen as another snub.

France’s insistence on stuffing as many weapons as possible into arms deals has also been cited as one of the reasons why Morocco finally opted to buy the U.S.-made F-16 fighter instead of the Rafale, which Paris wanted to supply in a single package together with helicopters and corvettes.

Another factor is that the election in May of Nicolas Sarkozy to succeed Chirac as French president has not gone down well with the Saudis, who take exception at his declarations that French diplomacy would in future distance itself from its traditional pro-Arab stance.

The loss of the Saudi contracts, whose total value was estimated at well over 7 billion euros, is a severe loss for French industry, which is encountering growing difficulties in exporting its weapons in the face of cut-throat competition from the United States and Russia.

Paris is now making a last-ditch attempt to salvage at least some Saudi deals, and President Sarkozy’s planned visit to Saudi Arabia, in January, might constitute such an opportunity. The sale of several Airbus tanker aircraft, and possibly of a reconnaissance satellite which Saudi Arabia would share with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, are two possibilities.

The sale of Fennec light helicopters, which the Saudis need for pilot training, may finally go through simply because there is no direct Russian competitor, sources say, noting however that this sale is only worth about 300 million euros.

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cg...3777102.5CYD9H8AAAEAAGchsJAAAAAP&modele=jdc_1
 

drg

New Member
This coming on the heels of the recent buy of Hummers and LAVS by the Saudi National Guard, from the US...
The French are getting AXED!!!
I noticed yesterday that on defense-aerospace.com,that the French have released a new IFV, the VBCI 8 X 8, and bought it for their armed forces (117 of them). I wonder now if they will even be able to export it...
 

SaudiArabian

New Member
i have clear doubts about this article and its credibility

Prince Sultan said a speach two days ago admiring the Saudi-French military relations and stated that many Saudi military staff get training in France and also admired the French weapons and called France a Strategic Partner.

there's no such thing is been anounced about canceling the deal , nor anything clear about beginning it.

but at the same time , the deputy minister of defense of Russia was in the Kingdom delivering a message from Putin to Prince Sultan and had talks but there's no Saudi-Russian deal announced whatsoever.
 

Izzy1

Banned Member
i have clear doubts about this article and its credibility

Prince Sultan said a speach two days ago admiring the Saudi-French military relations and stated that many Saudi military staff get training in France and also admired the French weapons and called France a Strategic Partner..

Saudi Arabian - lets be fair. Paris has let us down right across the board - and dare I say, a few in the General Staff have now realised this to. France supllied the same kit to us and Saddam's Iraq?
 

Doc Leech

New Member
drg - your from the US.

Explain, in detail, what you know about the SANG.
Is it now a requirement to be an expert on a topic before you are allowed to discuss it? To the point where you are essentially asking for the guys credentials? I fail to see why his comment garnered the reaction that it appears to have done, unless his tiny bit of SANG news was an outright fallacy on his part. You may have a very valid reason, so please feel free to enlighten me. I'm genuinely curious!

Reactions such as that one may have something to do with why this board in particular has so many lurkers like myself.

I'm sorry I don't have any input relevant to the topic at hand, but I felt the need to say something in the hopes that I will be able to post in the future without being set upon for not being an expert.

Regards,
Marc
 

pshamim

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
SANG stand for "Saudi Arabian National Guard"

Sorry for the confusion.
 

drg

New Member
No expert, just a genius

Your attitude towards people not from Saudi Arabia leads me to question how u became a moderator on this board.
As Doc Leech put it so poignantly, one does not need to be an expert on every subject to make a comment.
1)Morocco bought F-16s rather than Rafales
2) Saudi Arabia bought Russian helicopters rather than French ones
3)France can now only sell equipment, with any chance of success to Libya, within it's tradtional area of arms sales.
As for the Saudi National Guard, you only need to visit defense-aerospace.com or defenseindustrydaily.com to know what the National Guard is buying. I also know which companies are involved in training the Sa diN
 

Preceptor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Is it now a requirement to be an expert on a topic before you are allowed to discuss it? To the point where you are essentially asking for the guys credentials? I fail to see why his comment garnered the reaction that it appears to have done, unless his tiny bit of SANG news was an outright fallacy on his part. You may have a very valid reason, so please feel free to enlighten me. I'm genuinely curious!

Reactions such as that one may have something to do with why this board in particular has so many lurkers like myself.

I'm sorry I don't have any input relevant to the topic at hand, but I felt the need to say something in the hopes that I will be able to post in the future without being set upon for not being an expert.

Regards,
Marc
One is free to post on this forum, providing of course one abides by the forum rules. In terms of general desires for posts and posting the idea is to inform and enlighten the members. As such, questions are fine because they tend to lead to answers, or if it is something like a question on policy, debates and discussion of the policy(ies) in question.

One need not be a defense expert in order to participate, though defence professionals tend to get more credence due to their background and experience, as well as potentially having access to more information than is publically available. However, when posting statements, unless the source is provided or already well known sometimes questions will arise.

I hope this helps, if there are another other questions, please feel free to ask.

-Preceptor
 
Many countries will have to procure fighters in the near future: Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Brazil, Libya, India, and the UAE. France has a very good chance of getting the future Bulgarian, Greek, Libyan, and Brazilian fighter procurement contracts. The combined procurement requirement of Greece and Bulgaria alone should total over a 100 aircraft. Sarkozy is reorganizing the way France deals with foreign defence procurement contracts; the old setup was very slow and incompetent.
 
Last edited:

swerve

Super Moderator
Many countries will have to procure fighters in the near future: Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Brazil, Libya, India, and the UAE. France has a very good chance of getting the future Bulgarian, Greek, Libyan, and Brazilian fighter procurement contracts. The combined procurement requirement of Greece and Bulgaria alone should total over a 100 aircraft. Sarkozy is reorganizing the way France deals foreign defence procurement contracts; the old setup was very slow and incompetent.
A few amendments to your list -

You should remove the UAE. It's still accepting F-16Es into service, & currently has more modern fighters (F-16E & Mirage 2000-9) than it has pilots or infrastructure to support. New fighters would only be feasible if it got rid of some of what it currently has, e.g. swapped the Mirages for Rafales.

Other countries in the market for small numbers are Slovakia & Croatia. The Argentinean air force wants & needs new fighters. Some of the JSF consortium members haven't committed themselves to buying it (the Netherlands, for example, may switch if the price ends up too high, & has officially listed Eurofighter & Rafale as alternatives - but only if AESA-equipped), & are evaluating other aircraft i.e. Denmark, Norway & Turkey. Belgium will need to replace its F-16s & is open to offers. Switzerland is looking at a new fighter.
 

riksavage

Banned Member
If the Argentinean's bought Rafale and relationships with the UK deteriorated to the point whereby a renewed conflict became a real possibility over the Falklands (say driven by UK oil exploration in the area) then we could witness a potential Typhoon vs Rafale scenario - now that would be a interesting prospect!
 

Ozzy Blizzard

New Member
If the Argentinean's bought Rafale and relationships with the UK deteriorated to the point whereby a renewed conflict became a real possibility over the Falklands (say driven by UK oil exploration in the area) then we could witness a potential Typhoon vs Rafale scenario - now that would be a interesting prospect!
Rafale would be ripped to shreds in minets, not because its a worse fighter but because of the assets the RAF would bring to the fight. A Typhoon in the hands of an RAF pilot, taking passive missile shots cued by E3 means rafale is toast and vegimite.

If we had a suprise attack and the 6 odd Typhoons got bounced then that would be interesting.

:eek:fftopic i know i know...


As far as argentina, they desperatly need modernisation of their air force. A4's, even super A4's are great birds but are hardely combat viable. They were behind the ball in '82, how are they going to fair 25 odd years later??? However i dont know wether argentina could afford rafale, considering the much cheaper options arround.
 

SaudiArabian

New Member
Saudi Arabian - lets be fair. Paris has let us down right across the board - and dare I say, a few in the General Staff have now realised this to. France supllied the same kit to us and Saddam's Iraq?
thats true but France gave priceless support that made these French-made missiles useless for Iraq in 90-91. but if you're referring to the rumors of French arms sales to Saddam after the war then i'm not sure if its true or not but it will have no impact on the Saudi-French relations.
 

Viper7

New Member
Well the Saudi decision could be based on diversifying the equipment in their armed forces. It could also be that the Mi-17s & Mi-35 are better suited machines to the hot desert environment of the country and is alot cheaper to the expensive to buy and expensive to maintain European helicopters. I don't think there is any political motivation, maybe just a different approach toward procurement requisites.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
.... but if you're referring to the rumors of French arms sales to Saddam after the war then i'm not sure if its true or not but it will have no impact on the Saudi-French relations.
No evidence for it whatsoever. Every French weapon found & claimed to be post-war turned out to be old, pre-1990. One batch of Rolands found in 2003 & reported by US bloggers to be new, based on date markings on them, were of a model which went out of production in 1988, for example. The date markings were from the Iraqi maintenance depot which had overhauled them, the name of which was also on the missiles - in Arabic.
 

balamir

New Member
Some of the JSF consortium members haven't committed themselves to buying it (the Netherlands, for example, may switch if the price ends up too high, & has officially listed Eurofighter & Rafale as alternatives - but only if AESA-equipped), & are evaluating other aircraft i.e. Denmark, Norway & Turkey.
Turkey signed MoU for 100 F-35s. So I would say Turkey has committed itself as there are no other plans at this time for any other 4th generation aircraft. Eurofighter was rejected by the Minister of Defence on the basis of Cyprus' anti-Turkish stand in European defence organizations.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Turkey signed MoU for 100 F-35s. So I would say Turkey has committed itself as there are no other plans at this time for any other 4th generation aircraft. Eurofighter was rejected by the Minister of Defence on the basis of Cyprus' anti-Turkish stand in European defence organizations.
Signing an MoU isn't a commitment. It's a statement of intent. A formal statement, but not binding. Plenty of previous negotiations for arms sales have reached that stage & never proceeded to an actual sale.

But I agree that it's very likely indeed that Turkey will buy F-35, & unlikely that it'll buy anything else.
 
Russia Denies Reports of Copter Sales to Gulf States


Rosoboronexport State Corporation denied rumors of a helicopter sale to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. During a press conference Nov. 11, Rosoboronexport officials categorically denied recent media reports that Saudi Arabia had ordered Mi-17 and Mi-35 helicopters for $2.2 billion. “I don’t know the source of this information, but there has been no official statement on this issue,” said Mikhail Petukhov, a Rosoboronexport official.
defence news


Looks like this is not a done deal yet.
 
Top