FN SCAR, news, info, and questions.

F-15 Eagle

New Member
Does anyone here know if the FN SCAR is in service with the U.S. special forces yet? I heard 600 are the first of 1800 to be used by the U.S. Army rangers just wondering if they are buying them or not? Does that include the SCAR in 7.62 NATO as well?

And lastly has it been chosen for the USMC IAR concept? If anyone has news on that or not.
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
Hmmm....well this thread failed. I guess I'm just talking to myself don't know why but yeah.
 

Gremlin29

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Does anyone here know if the FN SCAR is in service with the U.S. special forces yet? I heard 600 are the first of 1800 to be used by the U.S. Army rangers just wondering if they are buying them or not? Does that include the SCAR in 7.62 NATO as well?

And lastly has it been chosen for the USMC IAR concept? If anyone has news on that or not.
I just checked the Army Times and they have a recent article that stated that 600 of the 1800 SCARs that the Army committed to purchasing were deliverd to 1st Bat earlier last month. I thought the Marines had ruled out the SCAR, but I haven't kept up with what those guys are doing and things change on a daily basis at DoD, so it seems.
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
I just checked the Army Times and they have a recent article that stated that 600 of the 1800 SCARs that the Army committed to purchasing were deliverd to 1st Bat earlier last month. I thought the Marines had ruled out the SCAR, but I haven't kept up with what those guys are doing and things change on a daily basis at DoD, so it seems.
I hope the Army will buy more SCARs. If the special forces get them which the spacial are always the first to get new toys than maybe the regular army will buy them to replace the 40 year old AR-15 design.

As far as I know Colt, H&K, and FN are the 3 remaining contenders for the IAR program but that was 6 months ago so I'm sure things have changed.
 

Gremlin29

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I think they are sticking with the M4 platform for a good while yet. Of the 3, the FN get's my vote. The H&K isn't a bad weapon, but it's virtually a gas pistoned AR. If the US is going to re-equip with a new battle rifle I'd prefer to see them move on to a new/better platform. I don't understand why they cling to Colt like they do. Probably find out the AlGore has a stake in Colt. :eek:nfloorl:
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
I think they are sticking with the M4 platform for a good while yet. Of the 3, the FN get's my vote. The H&K isn't a bad weapon, but it's virtually a gas pistoned AR. If the US is going to re-equip with a new battle rifle I'd prefer to see them move on to a new/better platform. I don't understand why they cling to Colt like they do. Probably find out the AlGore has a stake in Colt. :eek:nfloorl:
Because Colt makes deals with the DoD so they still get their damn profit. Thats the only reason. The M4 is good but there are better weapons out there. The SCAR is much better. Why they canceled the XM8 is beyond me. The XM8 is much better than the M16 by a long shot.
 

Driller

New Member
Indeed the Xm8 was/is better then any M16/M4 Platform ever will be but thankfully, most have followed the footsteps of HK and made all there systems modular. Personally i don't think the SCAR in any form is a step up from a M4/M16 or an AK for that matter. If your talking about a replacement for the army id but my bet on just an upper receiver upgrade considering the current climate. M468, M416 Or a system with the Grendel 6.5.
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #8
Indeed the Xm8 was/is better then any M16/M4 Platform ever will be but thankfully, most have followed the footsteps of HK and made all there systems modular. Personally i don't think the SCAR in any form is a step up from a M4/M16 or an AK for that matter. If your talking about a replacement for the army id but my bet on just an upper receiver upgrade considering the current climate. M468, M416 Or a system with the Grendel 6.5.
The SCAR has one advantage over the regular M4/M16, that is full auto. But the H&K 416 or M468 would be nice.
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
I think they are sticking with the M4 platform for a good while yet. Of the 3, the FN get's my vote. The H&K isn't a bad weapon, but it's virtually a gas pistoned AR. If the US is going to re-equip with a new battle rifle I'd prefer to see them move on to a new/better platform. I don't understand why they cling to Colt like they do. Probably find out the AlGore has a stake in Colt. :eek:nfloorl:
I have some good news. Colts so called contract is over and the Army now has rights to the M4. Seriously WTF what so they did not have rights before and they were forced to use whatever Colt gave them? Thats bullshit. I could be mistaken though.

But anyway the Army plains to update its carbine requirements and look into replacing the M4 by 2012. There are no guaranties though with the DoD but hopefully in a few years a new rifle will replace the out dated M4/M16.

This might actually surprise you but check out this army times article:

Army acquires rights to M4 - Army News, news from Iraq, - Army Times
 
Last edited:

Gremlin29

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
If DoD didn't pay the manufacturer for design services, they aren't entitled to the design. Realize the grand daddy to the M4 was designed back in the days when manufacturers often (not always) developed new systems and marketed them to DoD. The Federal Acquistion Regulations are so goofy it has to be experienced to be believed.

In the past decade, and in agreement with Driller the XM8 was the closest thing to a new and remarkable rifle we have seen since the first AR's started service way way back when. I was excited to see that it appeared to be the new battle rifle but alas, such was not to be. :ar15
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
If DoD didn't pay the manufacturer for design services, they aren't entitled to the design. Realize the grand daddy to the M4 was designed back in the days when manufacturers often (not always) developed new systems and marketed them to DoD. The Federal Acquistion Regulations are so goofy it has to be experienced to be believed.

In the past decade, and in agreement with Driller the XM8 was the closest thing to a new and remarkable rifle we have seen since the first AR's started service way way back when. I was excited to see that it appeared to be the new battle rifle but alas, such was not to be. :ar15
Oh I know about the DoD acquisition mess its absolutely unbelievable and outright pathetic! If they cancel the next carbine replacement I'm going to be so pissed! They need to completely overhaul the way weapons are contracted and bought. Its like they have a bunch of criminals in charge of the procurement system. Some major changes are long over due.

Its too bad the XM8 was canned. That was a damn beautiful weapon too, resembling the German G36 in a way. Maybe they will bring it back too life but thats just wishful thinking.
 

steve33

Member
Oh I know about the DoD acquisition mess its absolutely unbelievable and outright pathetic! If they cancel the next carbine replacement I'm going to be so pissed! They need to completely overhaul the way weapons are contracted and bought. Its like they have a bunch of criminals in charge of the procurement system. Some major changes are long over due.

Its too bad the XM8 was canned. That was a damn beautiful weapon too, resembling the German G36 in a way. Maybe they will bring it back too life but thats just wishful thinking.
What was the reason given for the XM8 being canned because from all the info i have been able to find on it the reports were good.
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #13
What was the reason given for the XM8 being canned because from all the info i have been able to find on it the reports were good.
It was a great rifle but it was canceled only because of politics. Colt maid some deals with the DoD so they still get contracts despite whether the M4 is the best carbine or not and rule out any other competition. Now that has changed as Colt no longer has rights to be the only carbine manufacturer and other companies can build new rifles and the possibilty of a new rifle for the army can be ready by 2012 assuming politics does not get in the way again.
 

Driller

New Member
I'm not sure H&K are still developing it but they might put it up for consideration when the Army puts in its tender. I wouldn't be surprised if the 416 or 469 or any of the acr's get chosen but to me they aren't a great leap ahead. Sure those weapons come with alot of things standard compared to the m4 but it would be a shame to award the contract for the same weapon...
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #15
I'm not sure H&K are still developing it but they might put it up for consideration when the Army puts in its tender. I wouldn't be surprised if the 416 or 469 or any of the acr's get chosen but to me they aren't a great leap ahead. Sure those weapons come with alot of things standard compared to the m4 but it would be a shame to award the contract for the same weapon...
I hope ether the SCAR-L/H, the H&K 416/417 or the M468(now called the REC7) are chosen to replace the M4 and the M16. I really hope the contract award does not go to the M4 again that would suck.
 

Driller

New Member
I hope ether the SCAR-L/H, the H&K 416/417 or the M468(now called the REC7) are chosen to replace the M4 and the M16. I really hope the contract award does not go to the M4 again that would suck.
Very much so but what would suck even more is if they award a contract then a couple years later someone comes up with a revolutionary leap in AR technology and they would have to wait another 40 years... But id like to see a 6.5mm contestant thrown in with the ones we have listed and i couldn't really see them moving away from the 5.56mm
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #17
Very much so but what would suck even more is if they award a contract then a couple years later someone comes up with a revolutionary leap in AR technology and they would have to wait another 40 years... But id like to see a 6.5mm contestant thrown in with the ones we have listed and i couldn't really see them moving away from the 5.56mm
The 5.56mm does a good job at knocking people down and killing them I have no doubt it works and does exactly what it needs to do but the 6.5mm however is better or the 6.8 SPC ether one should replace the 5.56 NATO.

I can't see them using the AR-15 platform for another 40 years but I think we will have to wait for 4-5 years though. There is not much more that they can do to the AR-15 it will still be the same gun.
 

Vajt

New Member
Another benefit of going to a 6.5/6.8mm round is that one round can replace various ones currently used, assault rifle, sharp-shooter (with extended barrel rifle) and machinegun. This may cost more initially but logistically it would save money in the long run.

-----JT-----
 

Vajt

New Member
Another option is to keep the M4 for now, maybe make some improvements to them, and see what comes out of the AAI LSAT assault rifle development. Why go for an incremental improvement when they could just be a few years away from having a real next generation weapon.

-----JT-----
 

F-15 Eagle

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #20
Another option is to keep the M4 for now, maybe make some improvements to them, and see what comes out of the AAI LSAT assault rifle development. Why go for an incremental improvement when they could just be a few years away from having a real next generation weapon.

-----JT-----
The only way to actually improve the M4 Carbine is to just replace it with the H&K 416 which is a M4 but but has some major upgrades. Check out this video from youtube about the 416. I think its an amazing rifle.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsgstaO18jY"]YouTube - Future Weapons Season 2 Episode 6(First Strike): The HK 416[/ame]
 
Top