Farewell Obannon....

rickusn

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Cushing the last of the Spruances will decommission September 21st.

Leaving 23 Ticonderoga CG-47 class, 46 A. Burke DDG 51 I/II/IIA class and 30 OHP FFG 7 class surface combatants in service on September 30th the end of the FY.

Farewell O'Bannon

By Lt.j.g. Greg Cruser, From USS O'Bannon PAO

[url="http://www.mayportmirror.com/images/081805/44298_200.jpg"]http://www.mayportmirror.com/images/081805/44298_200.jpg[/url]

The Spruance-class destroyer USS O'Bannon (DD 987) approaches the pier in Souda harbor during its last deployment earlier this year. O'Bannon will be decommissioned tomorrow (Aug. 19). Photo by Paul Farley
After more than 25 years of service, USS O'Bannon (DD-987) is set to decommission at 10 a.m. tomorrow (Aug. 19).

O'Bannon returned from its last deployment in May 2005 and has been preparing to decommission throughout the summer. O'Bannon was commissioned in December of 1979 by Mrs. Robert H. Barrow, the wife of a former Commandant of the Marine Corps.

The guest speaker at the decommissioning ceremony will be Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Adm. Gary Roughead. Roughead was the Chief Engineer on board O'Bannon when it was commissioned in 1979.

During O'Bannon's final deployment, it visited 12 cities in seven different countries. Its operations in the Mediterranean Sea included exercises with ships and naval aircraft from seven different nations. O'Bannon played a significant role in the Global War on Terrorism which included escorting military sea lift ships through potentially dangerous chokepoints, three major multinational exercises and extensive patrolling within the Sixth Fleet Area of Responsibility.

O'Bannon's final deployment was marked by several significant events including a rare liberty call in Haifa, Israel, a visit from the Secretary of Defense, and a rescue at sea.

O'Bannon was the first U.S. Navy ship in almost four years to have liberty in Israel. The crew gladly accepted the honor as United States Sailors enjoyed a chance to experience Israeli culture and meet with Israeli citizens for the first time since 2001.

The Honorable Donald Rumsfeld visited O'Bannon while it was anchored in Villefranche, France. The Secre-tary of Defense was in Nice, France meeting with NATO Defense Ministers when he took time to visit O'Bannon and thank the crew for their service.

While enroute from Ville-franche to Augusta Bay, Sicily, O'Bannon received a distress signal from a sinking fishing vessel that had been without power for three days in heavy seas. O'Bannon's Rescue and Assistance Team boarded the fishing vessel, made repairs, and evacuated two Danish fisherman. The two fisherman were taken safely to Augusta Bay, Sicily where they were turned over to Italian authorities for a safe transport home. The fishing vessel was made seaworthy as well allowing its subsequent recovery a few days later by French Authorities.

O'Bannon has conducted operations with countless nations in places all over the world, deploying to Central and South America in 2003 for Counter-Drug Operations and most recently deploying to the Mediterranean Sea on its final deployment. Its versatile and dynamic combat abilities have allowed it to meet a vast array of missions throughout its nearly 26-year history of service.

USS O'Bannon was named after Lt. Presley O'Bannon of United States Marine Corps. Lt. O'Bannon led a daring rescue on a fortress in Northern Africa during the U.S. War with the Barbary Pirates who had taken hostage a group of shipwrecked American Sailors. Lt. O'Bannon captured the fortress at Tripoli and defeated the enemies' attempts to take it back. He flew the American flag over the fort representing the first time the Stars and Stripes had been raised over foreign soil. His victory was commemorated in the Marine Corps Hymn: ''To the Shores of Tripoli.'' O'Bannon is one of two remaining Spruance Class Destroyers and is the last Spruance in the Atlantic Fleet. Cmdr. Troy A. Stoner assumed command March 12, 2003, and will be O'Bannon's last commanding officer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rickusn

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
This will make 11 sunk as targets with 8 others programmed for the same fate out of 31:

Pic attached:
http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=27301050821-N-6932B-084 Pacific Ocean (Aug. 19, 2005) - The Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer USS Russell (DDG 59) fires her MK 45 5-inch/54 caliber lightweight gun during a Pre-aim Calibration Fire (PACFIRE) in the Pacific Ocean. The PACFIRE is part of an upcoming training exercise where Russell and several other U.S. Navy assets will sink the decommissioned destroyers USS Oldendorf (DD 972) and USS Fife (DD 991). U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 1st Class Richard J. Brunson (RELEASED)

Of the others:

1 EDD 964 Self-Defense System Test Ship
1 Sank during DC experiments
3 Slated for transfer 1 to Pakistan and two to Trurkey
1 Logistics Support Asset
1 Scrapped
1 To be Scrapped
1 Spruance In Reserve
2 In Reserve CAT B
1 Donation Hold
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tatra

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
Have the Turk been offered Spruances officially and have they accepted already?

Anything new on the Spruance offered to Pakistan: have they accepted?

How many of the decommed Spruances will be made available to other navies?
 

rickusn

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
NO
NO
Dont know.

Latest Indian News:



Posted 08/23/05 11:07 Print-friendly versionIndia, U.S. Prepare To Discuss Weapon Buys
By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI, NEW DELHI



Indian and U.S. officials will discuss the possible sale to New Delhi of U.S. weaponry — including Aegis missile systems, an amphibious platform dock ship, anti-submarine patrol aircraft and Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC)-3 air defense systems — when Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kohler, the Pentagon’s Defense Cooperation Security Agency chief, visits here next month.

Indian Defence Ministry sources said arming Indian destroyers with anti-submarine patrol aircraft and Aegis missile systems would help the ships detect Chinese submarines operating in the Indian Ocean region. India also considers purchase of an anti-ballistic air defense system like the PAC-3 or the Israeli-U.S. Arrow-2 a priority, and money is not an issue, a Defence Ministry official said.

The meeting between Kohler and senior Indian Defence Ministry officials will be the first since the two countries agreed to begin cooperating on civilian nuclear efforts here during Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to United States in July.



Kohler will give officials here a classified technical briefing on the PAC-3, F-16 and F-18 multirole, multirange combat aircraft.

Officials also will discuss India’s possible purchase of the USS Trenton, a decommissioned Austin-class amphibious transport dock, used to transport large numbers of troops over long distances.

An Indian Navy official, however, said the Trenton is not in good condition.
The Indian Navy also wants to buy U.S. Aegis combat systems for its ships. The Navy official said the system can monitor large areas of the Indian Ocean, keeping an eye on Chinese ships and submarines there. The Aegis system can defend Indian sea-based assets from short- and long-range missiles, added the Navy official, who strongly advocated the purchase of this system.
Defence Ministry officials said Aug. 23 that the government likely will buy the Aegis system even though similar systems are available from other sources in the world at a cheaper price.


 

Nautilus

New Member
Taiwan wanted AEGIS and didn't get it, I'd be surprised if India would get it.

Possible the USA changed their mind in hindsight of the current Chinese military exercise and activities in Tibet?
 

Cootamundra

New Member
"Taiwan wanted AEGIS and didn't get it, I'd be surprised if India would get it."

Try again - The sale to Taiwan did not go ahead as it was not considered to be absolutely necessary. Why, well because the US 7th fleet and the Japanese Navy is on hand if things go south. Until then there is no need to inflame the situation with a high profile tech transfer like AEGIS. Not to mention the security threats of selling to a Chinese nation....

India will get AEGIS as the US is definetly looking to offset the expansion of Chinese influence in the region. Not to mention the fact that Pakistan continues to look less like an ally and more like a refuge for AQ. The AEGIS decision may not come for some time but the US will end up selling them the tech, that or lose the sale to Europe, and of course that will not do. Australia got access becuase of our long history of alignment with the US and because of the solid interation between the RAN and USN. India in my opinion will emerge over the next decade to be one of the US' major supporters in the region. In the end Democracies look to each other...
 

Nautilus

New Member
Imho the US is too worried about AEGIS secrets leaking out. I doubt they'll sell it before its successor is ready. If they sell it than it'd be a scaled down & less capable version.

The US uses non-western countries as they please. If they are looking into cooperating with India more than previously, then only because of its geographical location between China and (the oilfields of) the middle east.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Nautilus said:
Imho the US is too worried about AEGIS secrets leaking out. I doubt they'll sell it before its successor is ready. If they sell it than it'd be a scaled down & less capable version.
Basic Aegis is 25+ years old. Similar capability from other navies using Aegis principles is only just emerging. So, if nations don't want Aegis, then there is always the Euro version. ;)

Nautilus said:
The US uses non-western countries as they please. If they are looking into cooperating with India more than previously, then only because of its geographical location between China and (the oilfields of) the middle east.
japan, thailand, sth korea, have been persistent long term allies - not exactly "western" either.

I'm still trying to work out the relevance of all this with respect to farewelling the O'Bannon though...
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
knightrider4 said:
Didn't the USN offer Australia the four vessels which are now being offered to Taiwan?
Yep. Also 3 x Tico Fl 1's were offered up. Rejected after our unfortunate experience with the Newports.
 

Nautilus

New Member
What was so unfortunate about them other than being too small?

I believe it is more likely they were rejected because a) of crewing requirements and b) they are 'old'. Also, the very first unit (Ticonderoga) has suffered from structural damaged. Apparently largish cracks have been discovered in front of the superstructure.

The US is decommissioning them because US$1billion were not approved for the upgrade to VLS. Makes US$200million per ship.
 

Salman78

New Member
Cootamundra said:
" In the end Democracies look to each other...
That is as far away from the truth as it can get .

'Self Interest' (either personal, national or any other kind ) is the mother of all alliances.

Watchout for a degraded Agies system for India. Lockheed would'nt give software access to Turkey for it's AH 1Z King Cobra even though turkey is an old ally, threating to roll back the deal. You think Agies system wud be offered to india just like that ? get real
 

knightrider4

Active Member
Perhaps they will perhaps they wont. As members have pointed out however India could probably get a European system such as APAR or the EMPAR G system or perhaps even the UK SAMPSON system in which case the argument that Lm would be unwilling to release the Aegis technology is a moot point seeing as the other systems are using the latest active radar array's, from what I understand the SPY-1 family of radars are passive units. However I,m pretty sure SPY-3D is an active array.
 
Last edited:
Top