F/A-22 EW capabilities

highsea

New Member
This is from an article entitled "Selling F-22 Secrets in Order to Save it"
I am not posting the entire article, just the relavent parts regarding the post topic. I will link the article at the end.
...The F-22's potential for electronic warfare (EW) is more intriguing and may be the mission that ensures the airplane is not abruptly terminated. Designed to go against sophisticated Soviet Cold War air defenses, the F-22 has a built-in complex of passive electronics surveillance sensors along the outside edges of the aircraft that allow it to rapidly identify and locate signals. It also has a radar that could be used to concentrate its transmission power strongly enough to jam air defense radars and communications links. With the addition of other equipment in 2010, it should be possible to focus enough energy into a beam strong enough to damage the electronics of enemy sensors. Combine with its "supercruise" ability (flying at supersonic speeds without guzzling excessive amounts of fuel) and its stealthy features, the F-22 is years ahead of any currently fielded (unclassified) flying EW airplane.

Designs for earlier generation electronic warfare aircraft to jam radars and communications systems were typically an afterthought, using an existing airframe such as the F-4 or A-6, rewriting it, and hanging a lot of electronics pods and generators on the wings. Adding such equipment took away from the capability to bring along weapons for self-defense and made the airplane a larger radar target. Currently, the Navy operates 100 aging (21 years old) EA-6 Prowlers to provide EW protection for both Navy and Air Force operations under a joint agreement and plans to replace the Prowlers with a version of the F-18. The Navy would like to start bringing the EF-18 "Growler" into service by 2010, but the Air Force wants other alternatives to be considered, including a dedicated UAV, a modified B-52 with very large jamming pods and a belly full of bombs to "kinetically suppress" radar emitters, and a version of the F-22.
http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/2004610.asp

I thought this was interesting. The ability for the radar to react and destroy an enemy radar attempting to target the AC would change the rules a bit. :smokingc:
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
There is no way the F-22 is going to get canned. It's in low rate initial production already and is already funded to produce somewhere in excess of 200 airframes AFAIK.

The USAF needs a new top tier fighter jet, the F-15 whilst it's been a magnificent aircraft is reaching the end of the period where it totally dominated every other fighter. The USAF WILL get the F-22. How many though is the only real debate that I see happening...
 

highsea

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
Aussie Digger said:
The USAF WILL get the F-22. How many though is the only real debate that I see happening...
We'll know more in 3 weeks. ;)

Kerry has never supported this program, and his budgetary philosophy leaves a lot to be desired, imo.

As it stands, funding is for 229 AC.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
No but politically the problem has always been the platform cost (the oft cited US $150 Million). This figure has always been cited by opponents of the program as excessive. I don't recall anyone publicly doubting the capability of the aircraft. These costs however are the platform costs, plus development costs, once the full rate production is underway.

I'll be interested to see the flyaway price of a mature platform from the middle or end of the production run. Methinks it will become politically, far more palatable, particularly if the USAF's F-15's keep getting "beaten" in International Airex's... :D:
 

highsea

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
Lol. Let's hope the F-15 keeps getting clobbered. :D: :D:

I think if production were to get bumped up to arout 400 planes, the price should drop to $70 Mil. or so, which would make it politically more acceptable. I would like to see the RAF and RAAF involved, but the pollyannas in Congress are pretty stuffy about exporting the tech.

Can't you guys start a war or something? (j/k) ;) :eek
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
highsea said:
Lol. Let's hope the F-15 keeps getting clobbered. :D: :D:

I think if production were to get bumped up to arout 400 planes, the price should drop to $70 Mil. or so, which would make it politically more acceptable. I would like to see the RAF and RAAF involved, but the pollyannas in Congress are pretty stuffy about exporting the tech.

Can't you guys start a war or something? (j/k) ;) :eek
have you seen the recent release of the Cope India requirements? The bases were loaded at the Indian AF request. The parameters were set for specific reasons, including the fact that the engagements were set at 4:1 and that the US missiles were parametered for 1/3rd of their engagement distance.

I'll see if I can drag out a non classified version.
 

highsea

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
gf, all I've seen was what you posted earlier. I would be interested in seeing more.

You know how these things go, lol, it's good for India to look good, and it's good for the US to look bad. It was a "win-win". :D:
 
Top