peterAustralia
Member
hi all,
I was reading the newspaper, I think it was the Age yesterday and there was an article about the British wanting to get a new light armored vehicle. Something on the lines of .. tanks are really great but they are heavy to airlift and tend to upset the locals where they are deployed, as the travel about narrow alleys etc.
The main point of the article (sorry I cannot recall exactly where i read it, could have been here) was that there are 16 projects for light armored vehicles in Europe at the moment as opposed to only 3 in the US. The end result is that these projects cost more and take longer than is necessary. The article seemed to advocate going with commercially available vehicles, in the British case some fellow recommended a French vehicle, and was later overruled in favour of a yet to be determined British vehicle.
I am sure that a purpose designed vehicle would be slightly better but the article said that such a vehicle would cost more and take longer to get into service.
My thoughts are kinda like, if the British buy a French vehicle and the French buy a British missile, wouldn't everybody do well.
comments anyone
peter
I was reading the newspaper, I think it was the Age yesterday and there was an article about the British wanting to get a new light armored vehicle. Something on the lines of .. tanks are really great but they are heavy to airlift and tend to upset the locals where they are deployed, as the travel about narrow alleys etc.
The main point of the article (sorry I cannot recall exactly where i read it, could have been here) was that there are 16 projects for light armored vehicles in Europe at the moment as opposed to only 3 in the US. The end result is that these projects cost more and take longer than is necessary. The article seemed to advocate going with commercially available vehicles, in the British case some fellow recommended a French vehicle, and was later overruled in favour of a yet to be determined British vehicle.
I am sure that a purpose designed vehicle would be slightly better but the article said that such a vehicle would cost more and take longer to get into service.
My thoughts are kinda like, if the British buy a French vehicle and the French buy a British missile, wouldn't everybody do well.
comments anyone
peter