except the berets have been removed from ceremonies as well (which is the core issue - not whether they're worn when tactical as specials (for eg) only wear them for dress or non tactical events). The exemption applies to units suchs as those in SOCOMD.Berets are unsuitable for humid climates, wearing a beret in humid conditions is one of the fastest ways of going bald early.
The berets could be retained for ceremonies only.
I think Bunker B is referring to today's announcement by the US Army to abandon the general issue beret. A very different circumstance to the Australian Army nonsense.except the berets have been removed from ceremonies as well (which is the core issue - not whether they're worn when tactical as specials (for eg) only wear them for dress or non tactical events). The exemption applies to units suchs as those in SOCOMD.
hence the ruckus as the argument about OH&S etc is pretty lame
The americans have been openly keen to embrace the philosophies and intent behind SRP, I just hope their beret decision wasn't coat tailing on one of our "good ideas"I think Bunker B is referring to today's announcement by the US Army to abandon the general issue beret. A very different circumstance to the Australian Army nonsense.
Yeah they are/were an absolute nightmare in the heat, after a day of sweating in them trying to salvage the berets and keeping them shaped is impossible... I heard its still at the discretion of commanders to keep them implemented in individual platoons...Berets are unsuitable for humid climates, wearing a beret in humid conditions is one of the fastest ways of going bald early.
The berets could be retained for ceremonies only.
Quite a few South and Latin American countries like Salvador and Colombia have followed the American practice of having a large patch on their berets.Having this big batch up front like an advertisement poster is ugly as hell and they should have had a look at the Brits and French to learn how to wear a beret before they introduced them.
I know it doesn't say much. I was not suggesting that just because its a U.S. practice that it should be emulated, merely that other countries have followed suit. Similiarly, non-NATO countries with British ties have adopted British traditions such as the regimental system, organisational patterns, etc.That dooesn't say much.
Quite a number of countries just use stuff because the US does and so it has to be good.
I remember being a kid in 2001 seeing a Marine in MARPAT which was at the time was being wear tested (NS Mayport, FL) and it had the slanted chest pocketsGetting off topic here but unless I'm mistaken the the U.S. ACU was the first with slanted chest pockets. What purpose does this serve?
The beret was dropped for wear with ACU's while in garrison back in 2011. The patrol is now worn at all times. The beret is still used in ACU's for ceremonies like change of command at the discretion of the command. The beret is still worn with the Army Service Uniform (looks like dress blues). Happily, the garrison cap was dropped for good, a hat dumber than the beret IMHO.I've got to wonder whats going on here with reguard to uniforms and headgear.First berets are not something you wear in the field (thats what patrolcaps and boonie hats are for).Second if the Army dropping the beret will this mean we're going back to the garrison cap?